|
Mary Jurcina-Taylor - 
April 23, 2013 |
| The brief was comprehensive and a good comparative. Interesting that we (Canada) have a variety of professionals leading toward the same goal for our population. |
|
|
|
Artem Safarov - 
March 14, 2013 |
| A good summary, although the omission of CFPC's Patient's Medical Home initiative is surprising. |
|
|
|
Roberta Heale - 
January 30, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
Ron Krawec - 
January 22, 2013 |
| Provides a good review of various implementations and pilots across the nation. I could not emphasize enough the need for robust, integrated clinical information systems and the need for a single interdisciplinary plan of care that goes beyond just medical care but also addresses functional and psychosocial barriers to health and participation. |
|
|
|
Jody Grywul - 
January 22, 2013 |
| found it interesting how statistics show Alberta's PCN benefited diabetics |
|
|
|
Morgan Truax - 
January 21, 2013 |
| Interesting and informative. |
|
|
|
Luc Chartrand - 
January 11, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
Yu-Chen Lin - 
January 4, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
Kaylee Ramage - 
January 3, 2013 |
| Interesting and informative. |
|
|
|
John Arnold - 
November 19, 2012 |
| I wonder how many medical students are aware of this? |
|
|
|
Sheri Ross - 
November 15, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
Ahana Sarkar - 
November 14, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
Mitch Gillingwater - 
November 8, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
Joy Walker - 
November 7, 2012 |
| Good overview of teamwork in primary health care in Canada. I was drawn to work in a CHC in Ontario because of their inter-professional team model; unfortunately, it didn't work that well in the 17 years I worked there. We have a long ways to go; however, the care provided by inter-professional teams, regardless of how well they work, is still better than stand-alone physician private practice. |
|
|
|
Justin Noble - 
November 6, 2012 |
| I appreciate the informative table that puts all the various models in one place, making comparison easier. |
|
|
|
Susanne Watson - 
November 5, 2012 |
| Good perspective from across the county in terms of what efforts have been tried to create team based care from a primary health care perspective. Interprofessional team model have been identified but to achieve the desired outcomes - true collaboration must be present and this review doesn't make reference to the need for education of teams of the competencies required to move from inter-disciplinary practice to collaborative practice that includes integrated and shared care interventions. |
|
|
|
Rob Acheson - 
November 5, 2012 |
| An interesting summary of the activities across the country. Also interesting, but not surprising, are the similarities. |
|
|
|
Bruce Beamer - 
November 5, 2012 |
A nice overview. Convenient to have this information collected in one spot.
One big challenge is the ability to adopt the innovation which has been shown to work already. |
|
|
|
Brenda Galbraith - 
November 5, 2012 |
| Hopefully the Health care system will embrace the practice of Interdisipinary teams and put in place the resources and leadership necessary to make this system work. Patient care in the future is going to be more complicated and a strain on funding. If we could plan out care more completely, the time individuals spend at a medical facility would be minimized. |
|
|
|
Anne Brasset Latulippe - 
November 5, 2012 |
| Interesting. Give a good idea of what is going on in Canada. Little bit long for a brief. |
|
|
|
Victoria Aceti Chlebus - 
November 5, 2012 |
I liked the way the review was structured in that it compared different provinces' and terrorities' primary health care structures. I t illustrated to me how close all the provinces are in their viewing of primary health care structures - its usually just the terminology that is different.
Like other reviewers have said, there isn't new information for those already working in primary care, but as an instructor at the post-secondary level, this is a great teaching guide for those just learning about primary health care structures in Canada. |
|
|
|
Corey Hammond - 
November 5, 2012 |
Good concise info, but not much of a surprise to anyone working in primary care, I suspect. Without direction and leadership from government both federally and provincially, primary care will continue to stumble along, trying their best but wondering if they are actually getting any further ahead. The situation is frustrating for providers who know that what we are doing isn't enough, but do not have the support to change anything, nor the knowledge of what to change and how. |
|
|
|
Rino Volpe - 
November 2, 2012 |
| This is a very good summary of what is going on in Canada in terms of different primary care delivery models. It also shows that we are still trying to find our way. |
|
|
|
Philip Baer - 
October 31, 2012 |
| A very useful summary of the Canadian landscape in primary care, covering the variety of different team models. As we move to this type of team medical care, we need to understand how to implement these new models effectively while preserving the autonomy of individual team members and preventing dysfunction within these teams. |
|
|