Printer icon Print Page

International Economic Trends

Report Subscriptions

Every employee at your organization will get access to the research through our e-Library.

International Economic Trends Service

Annual fee: $3,775

This e-Library service gives your organization:
  • World Outlook—our quarterly two-year forecast of the global economy that includes outlooks for the world's major economies.
  • U.S. Outlook—our quarterly two-year forecast of the American economy.
  • StraightTalk—a monthly publication from the Chief Economist of The Conference Board, Inc. which provides economic research, objective analysis and forecasts to help new economy business executives assess economic conditions impacting their markets that tracks the latest developments in labour, consumer, energy and housing markets.

U.S. Forecast (Five-year) Database Service

Annual fee: $2,085

Five-year forecast for the U.S. economy that includes detailed data on the following areas: Gross domestic product, Detailed income and consumption, Consumer price index, Consumer expenditures, Housing starts, Corporate profits and Unemployment rate. The forecast is updated quarterly. More than 100 indicators are available.

Global Commerce Centre

The Global Commerce Centre aims to help Canadian leaders understand global economic shifts and their practical implications. The Centre has published more than 50 innovative reports, which have been widely read by business leaders and government officials. We use a variety of channels (including media, published reports, commentaries, blogs, webinars, and in-person presentations) to inform policy-makers, business leaders, and the public about what changes in the global environment mean for Canadian business and government strategies.

We draw on the Conference Board's established capacity in economic analysis to provide evidence-based tools and strategies for Canadian companies to succeed in global markets; and for governments to establish sound, effective, related public policies. The Centre makes recommendations for policy reform and strategies for success, based on sound analysis and independent evidence. The Centre’s private and public sector members also meet regularly to hear new research, policy and business insights.


International Cooperation

For over 20 years, the Conference Board has been involved in projects of international co-operation, trade, and investment policy. This experience has enabled the Board to supplement its domestic expertise and leverage it to the advantage of members.

The International Cooperation team has chiefly been involved in offering expertise in project management, program evaluation, and capacity building for economic, public policy and governance reforms.

This work can be classified into three major areas:

  • Delivery of knowledge based on rigorous research by a multidisciplinary team of professionals.
  • Project management and delivery of networking events and large group consultation processes with a focus on trade and Investment issues.  
  • Project management of projects funded by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA).

U.S. Month at a Glance

Latest issue:
July 10, 2017

Kip’s Commentaries

Read the latest commentaries by Kip Beckman, Principal Economist, World Outlook

Go Back

Anti-Globalization: We Have Been Here Before

Kip Beckman
Principal Economist
World Outlook

Globalization generated sharp increases in wealth, thanks in part to rapidly expanding trade and the free movement of people across national borders. However, the gains from globalization were not shared equally. This growing disparity between the rich and poor (especially lower-income workers) contributed to voter support for right-wing nationalists who promised to turn the tables on free trade and implement controls on immigration.

If that sounds like a description of 2016, it isn’t. The year was 1914: The beginning of World War I ended an unprecedented four-decade increase in trade, immigration, and standards of living. The backlash against open borders and trade sharply weakened the global economy and contributed to the outbreak of World War II.

Morgan Stanley Chief Global Strategist Ruchir Sharma contends that there are eerie similarities between the end of globalization in 1914 and the present hostility toward trade and immigration.1 The most recent globalization boom started after World War II and picked up steam in the 1980s due to rapid technological change. After losing momentum during the 2008 financial crisis, this wave of globalization is now in retreat. The election of Donald Trump, Brexit, and the rise of right-wing populist leaders across Europe, who are committed to leaving the EU and putting the brakes on migration, are clear signs of the dawn of a new era.

Both globalization eras were driven by swift changes to technology and the opening of large economies to international trade. Prior to 1914, the expanding use of the telegraph and steamships along with the opening of Great Britain’s economy (the world’s largest in the 19th century) to greater imports drove the global economy forward. The more recent period of globalization was also linked to changing technology. Container ships, personal computers, and the Internet, as well as China’s and India’s embrace of the global economy and international trade, all helped boost globalization.

Elevated unemployment rates (particularly among blue-collar, mid-skilled workers), rising income inequality, and declining social mobility contributed to today’s turn against globalization. Employment and social dislocation were also sources of unrest in the early part of the 20th century. Between 1879 and the late 1920s, the share of income going to the wealthiest 1 per cent of Americans rose to a peak of nearly 20 per cent.

Anger over inequality increased, and politicians gained power on promises to reverse the trend toward a more open world economy. The U.S. Congress implemented the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act in 1930. The result was a global trade war, as its trading partners retaliated against the rise in U.S. tariffs. International trade slumped from a peak of 30 per cent of global GDP in 1914 to around 10 per cent by 1933. The United States also clamped down on immigration: From the million or so migrants who came to that country in 1914, new arrivals slowed to a trickle within two decades.

The similarities of these two eras have some important implications for today’s global economy. On the plus side, the abrupt end to the period of increased trade and immigration that culminated with the outbreak of World War I didn’t completely eliminate the forces in favour of globalization. It took decades, but eventually globalization became recognized as a catalyst for economic growth and development.

There are also some important lessons from the past regarding the disastrous effects of implementing populist economic policies. Between the two world wars, the anti-globalization agenda took hold as countries increased barriers to trade. Weaker economic growth and rising inflation contributed to the beginning of the Great Depression in 1929. Currently, populist politicians are making the same mistake by demanding restrictions on immigration and the elimination of free trade deals. President Trump has already pulled the United States out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement and promises to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement.

The world economy is already dealing with restraints on economic growth attributable to slowing population growth and weak gains in productivity, and is expanding at a pace below 3 per cent. Policies that end up reducing international trade and immigration will only make the situation worse. Since World War II, few countries have managed to boost economic growth and reduce poverty without the stimulus provided by strong growth in exports. Higher barriers to trade will make it more difficult for developing countries to reach these goals.

The International Monetary Fund and other international institutions have defended globalization. They stress that most job losses in the manufacturing industry can be attributed to automation, not free trade agreements. Furthermore, developed countries like the United States and Canada need to attract more immigrants to counteract the effects of declining population growth. A greater focus on education, especially in the United States, would help to prepare the workforce for a far more technically oriented economy. But for the time being, it appears that the voices trumpeting the benefits of globalization have been shouted down.

1    NewYorkTimes.com, When Borders Close, November 12, 2016. www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/opinion/sunday/when-borders-close.html?_r=0 (accessed February 15, 2016).

Related Webinar

Canada’s Economy Amid Uncertainty—Insights from the Chief Economist
Live webinar by Craig Alexander, March 22, 2017 at 02:00 PM EDT

Facebook Twitter DZone It! Digg It! StumbleUpon Technorati Del.icio.us NewsVine Reddit Blinklist Add diigo bookmark


International Economics Team

Kip Beckman

Kip Beckman
Principal Economist